Kodak Printer - 5300 review
May 31, 2008

Affordable all-in-are now common enough to begin replacing peripherals dedicated to a level of consumption, which offers an impressive degree of functionality and performance for consumers. Kodak Printer EasyShare 5300 is the lowest-end model of its new range, omitting the functionality of fax and some other characteristics under 5500, but the launch at a substantial savings. Despite its relatively low price is a rather bulky unit, which could make some users if portability is a limitation.As you probably expect, taking into account the manufacturer, 5300 is a bit more photo-oriented than most print-at-all. You’ll find a built in 4×6-inch tray, multi-card reader and an external USB port for printing photographic instantly, managed for the sake of 3-inch color display and dedicated controls.
Document management is handled well: a retractable platform has standard prints and photo tray can be activated by pushing it forward into the printer to produce 6×4-inch lace. Performance is very good here, and although the standard text printing is not particularly fast, who were impressed by its photo capabilities, and quality of prints across the board can not really be blamed.
The photographs are accurate and strong, with the option of using the Kodak Perfect Touch technology for fast and easy improvement of the image. Monochrome prints show clear and deep black with very little bleeding, especially using inkjet paper. Based on the speeds, we come in a minute, many users might prefer to use the draft text so that, while appearing gray darker than the black, offers a much faster speed.
A full A4 photo took about two minutes from the end with a 6×4-inch print that appears in about 50 seconds, although you’ll see results in about 20 percent faster when printing directly from memory cards. Speed does not appear to differ much when compared text documents directly to the files containing images: two full pages have around 50 seconds as normal, but this right is reduced to 15 seconds in draft mode.
The copier is also very dependent on quality adjustments in terms of producing duplicates quickly, usually involving a minute of wait-page full color and about half that for the text. Copies are quite consistent but we did notice a drop in the sharpness of prints text. Explore appear in their choice of application in about 20 seconds, a time quite reasonable by any standard.
In general, 3-inch display and related controls make it very easy to handle all this from the printer itself and, obviously, giving it the ability to preview and print photos directly. Another very important point in the products of this nature is the replacement of ink on paper costs, something that Kodak has paid particular attention a. You’ll find color can be produced from as little as 7p each to the configuration of lower quality, and about 50 percent more when the jack things up, which is still much cheaper than most rivals.
So far, then, at least in terms of performance and ease of use, the 5300 is doing very well, but unfortunately we have not reached these conclusions without some problems along the way.
Despite very carefully installing the various components and successfully completing a routine calibration we realize a couple of ‘fatal’ mistakes during our initial impressions. Updating the firmware seemed to avoid these off for a short time, but different error messages occurred shortly thereafter. All printers occasionally take a mistake or two, but most frustrating about the Kodak is that you are only given an error code and useful instructions “telephone service ‘.
There appear to be no error code translation of documents on the site from Kodak and no real way to find out why the aircraft went wrong. These failures were finally using one of the two techniques that tend to work about 90 percent of the time in these situations - and turn it off again (the other is to give a kick).
Along with this, some users may be a bit put off by the size of 5300, and relatively slow at printing text normal resolutions means that it is more appropriate for those seeking to use its photo capabilities. In addition, do not seem to have much control over the quality levels in printing photos from Kodak software supplied, although the impression of the typical applications offers a range of options.
Comments
Got something to say?




